26 March RDFC
Practice passage
In large corporations, decision-making often hinges on factors that extend beyond the mere merit of an idea. A middle manager evaluating a novel but controversial project faces a tough choice: champion the project, risking years of effort and potential failure, or align with conventional thinking to ensure personal career growth. This dilemma, though framed in boardrooms, shares striking similarities with the dynamics of traffic jams.
On an empty highway, minor disruptions like a driver braking for a stray cat have negligible effects. However, on a crowded highway, the same action leads to a chain reaction. A brief slowdown by one driver results in subsequent delays for others, causing a sudden phase transition from smooth traffic flow to a gridlock. In organizations, a similar phenomenon occurs when competing incentives create a shift from innovation to politics.
At a small startup, the success of a single project could exponentially increase revenue. Employees, often with a direct stake in the company’s performance, naturally prioritize project success over office politics. But as a company scales, incentives change. A successful project in a large corporation may only marginally impact overall revenue, while the risks of failure are disproportionately high. In contrast, excelling at corporate politics — by aligning with leadership perspectives or undermining others — can yield faster promotions, higher salaries, and increased influence.
The concept of Return on Politics (ROP) emerges from this shift. Organizations with high ROP experience a decline in innovation as employees prioritize career growth through strategic maneuvering over bold ideas. To mitigate this, companies must balance four key parameters: Stake in Success, Salary Growth, Management Levels, and Project-Skill Fit. A greater personal stake in a project's success fosters innovation. When promotions yield moderate salary increments, the incentive for political behavior diminishes. Fewer management levels reduce the competition for promotions, further discouraging political maneuvering. Finally, assigning employees to projects aligned with their expertise enhances motivation and performance.
Recognizing and responding to early signals of a rising ROP, like a noticeable shift in conversations from project ideas to career growth, is essential. While no single model resolves organizational complexity, the phase transition framework offers a valuable lens to understand the interplay of forces. Like monitoring traffic flow, organizations must maintain a careful equilibrium to prevent gridlock and ensure sustained innovation.
------------------------------
Question Set 1: Reading Comprehension
1Q. According to the passage, what is the primary reason middle managers avoid supporting unconventional projects in large corporations?
a) Lack of personal confidence in the project’s potential
b) Fear of losing their job if the project fails
c) Lack of available resources for untested projects
d) Desire to reduce competition from colleagues
2Q. What concept does the author introduce to explain the shift in employee behavior as companies grow?
a) Return on Politics (ROP)
b) Phase Transition Index (PTI)
c) Innovation Threshold Ratio (ITR)
d) Competitive Edge Quotient (CEQ)
3Q. Which of the following is an example of a phase transition in an organization, as described in the passage?
a) A startup encouraging employee ownership of projects
b) A corporation adding multiple layers of management for better control
c) Employees gradually shifting their focus from innovation to politics
d) A company increasing salaries across all levels to boost productivity
4Q. The analogy of traffic jams is used in the passage to illustrate:
a) How large corporations manage employee movement within hierarchies
b) The impact of poor management decisions on company growth
c) The sudden shift in organizational behavior due to incentive misalignment
d) The need for flexible project management strategies
---
Question Set 2: Critical Reasoning
1Q. Which of the following, if true, would most weaken the author’s claim about the negative effects of ROP?
a) Large companies with high management levels often report high levels of employee satisfaction.
b) Employees in large organizations receive bonuses directly linked to the success of their projects.
c) A startup with low project-skill fit has struggled to bring innovations to market.
d) Companies with a flat hierarchy have fewer opportunities for employee growth.
2Q. The author suggests reducing the ROP by increasing employees’ stake in project success. What assumption underlies this suggestion?
a) Employees value monetary rewards over career advancement.
b) Employees are willing to sacrifice career growth for innovative opportunities.
c) Project success is easily measurable in all industries.
d) Innovation naturally leads to company-wide financial growth.
3Q. What would be the most likely consequence of eliminating salary growth as a promotion incentive in a large organization?
a) Increased employee loyalty and productivity
b) A greater focus on innovation over politics
c) A rise in job dissatisfaction and turnover
d) Reduced competition for leadership positions
---
Question Set 3: Vocabulary and Contextual Meaning
1Q. In the context of the passage, what does the phrase "pounding the table" most likely mean?
a) Expressing anger physically
b) Firmly advocating for an idea
c) Criticizing others' perspectives
d) Protesting against management decisions
2Q. The term "exponentially" in the context of traffic flow most nearly means:
a) Gradually increasing over time
b) Increasing at a rapid and accelerating rate
c) Remaining consistent despite disturbances
d) Decreasing significantly with intervention
3Q. The phrase "keeping eyes and ears open for such signals" is best interpreted as:
a) Monitoring changes in employee behavior and conversations
b) Listening attentively to managerial instructions
c) Remaining cautious about potential project failures
d) Being aware of external market trends
---
Question Set 4: Para Summary
1Q. Which of the following best summarizes the main idea of the passage?
a) The success of unconventional projects in large companies depends on a strong support system from leadership.
b) Phase transitions explain how large companies often shift from innovation to politics due to structural and financial incentives.
c) Middle managers in corporations face a constant battle between personal ambition and organizational growth.
d) Implementing flat hierarchies is the most effective way to eliminate office politics and encourage innovation.
2Q. What is the author's primary purpose in this passage?
a) To suggest that companies should eliminate all management levels to reduce politics.
b) To argue that innovation is impossible in large organizations.
c) To propose a framework for understanding how politics can overshadow innovation in corporate environments.
d) To highlight the role of middle managers in preventing corporate stagnation.
Solution:
Question Set 1: Reading Comprehension Solutions
1. (b) Fear of losing their job if the project fails
- The passage highlights that middle managers often avoid unconventional projects due to the fear of failure and the risk of losing their jobs. They prefer safer options with predictable outcomes to protect their careers.
2. (a) Return on Politics (ROP)
- The author introduces the concept of Return on Politics (ROP) to describe the tendency of employees in large companies to focus on politics rather than innovation for career advancement.
3. (c) Employees gradually shifting their focus from innovation to politics
- The passage compares this shift to a traffic jam, explaining how incentives misaligned with innovation lead employees to prioritize politics over bold ideas.
4.(c) The sudden shift in organizational behavior due to incentive misalignment
- The traffic jam analogy illustrates how minor disruptions can escalate into major problems, similar to how small changes in company incentives can lead to a sudden rise in office politics.
---
Question Set 2: Critical Reasoning Solutions
1. (b) Employees in large organizations receive bonuses directly linked to the success of their projects.
- This undermines the author's argument since employees would have a stake in innovation rather than focusing on politics.
- (a) Large companies reporting employee satisfaction does not directly address the focus on politics over innovation.
- (c) A low project-skill fit in a startup is unrelated to the behavior in large corporations.
- (d) Fewer opportunities for growth don’t weaken the argument about political behavior due to high management levels.
2. (a) Employees value monetary rewards over career advancement.
- The author assumes that increasing employees’ financial stake will reduce political behavior, implying monetary rewards are preferred.
- (b) The author does not assume employees will sacrifice career growth entirely, only that incentives can shift focus.
- (c) The assumption does not require all industries to have easily measurable success metrics.
- (d) While growth is a goal, the suggestion is about individual behavior, not guaranteed company-wide growth.
3. (c) A rise in job dissatisfaction and turnoverturnover
- Without significant salary growth, employees may lose motivation, leading to dissatisfaction and resignations.
- (a) Eliminating salary growth would likely reduce loyalty, not increase it.
- (b) It is unlikely to lead to greater innovation when employees feel unrewarded.
- (d) Reduced competition may occur, but dissatisfaction will remain a larger issue.
---
Question Set 3: Vocabulary and Contextual Meaning Solutions
1. (b) Firmly advocating for an idea
- The phrase "pounding the table" metaphorically means expressing strong support or determination for a cause, particularly in a corporate setting.
2. (b) Increasing at a rapid and accelerating rate
- "Exponentially" in the context of traffic flow describes how a minor disruption can grow at an accelerating pace, causing a massive jam.
3. (a) Monitoring changes in employee behavior and conversations
- The author advises managers to observe subtle shifts in employee behavior and discussions to detect early signs of rising politics over innovation.
---
Question Set 4: Para Summary Solutions
1. (b) Phase transitions explain how large companies often shift from innovation to politics due to structural and financial incentives.
- The main idea revolves around the concept of phase transitions, where organizations move from innovation-focused to politics-driven environments as they grow.
2. (c) To propose a framework for understanding how politics can overshadow innovation in corporate environments.
- The author uses the traffic jam analogy to introduce a framework that helps organizations analyze and address the factors contributing to the rise of politics.
Daily morning cat specific articles
20 OFF [39₹ only]
Offer valid for first 100 members only
Coupon code: Catexam
Now available with paragraph
explanation
Buy now:
RDFC sample
Comments
Post a Comment